In reply to wangjiawen:
Sorry, but I made a mistake.
Assertions need to be tested!!!
we’re human :)
// ap_abc3 DOES NOT WORK as I expressed because
ap_abc3: assert property(@(posedge clk)
first_match(a ##1 (b[=1] and c[=1])) |-> d);
ap_abc3_equiv: assert property(@(posedge clk)
first_match(a ##1 (!b[*0:$] ##1 b ##1 !b[*0:$] and
!c[*0:$] ##1 c ##1 !c[*0:$])) |-> d);
// Then the !b[*0:$] gives you the option of a thread !b[*0],
// thus not a requirement for for a follow-up "b" to be equal to 0.
//----- WHAT IS NEEDED INSTEAD
ap_abc2_want: assert property(@(posedge clk)
first_match(a ##1 (!b[*0:$] ##1 b ##1 !b[*1:$] and
!c[*0:$] ##1 c ##1 !c[*1:$] )) |-> $past(d));
Ben Cohen
http://www.systemverilog.us/ ben@systemverilog.us
For training, consulting, services: contact http://cvcblr.com/home.html
** SVA Handbook 4th Edition, 2016 ISBN 978-1518681448
…
- SVA Package: Dynamic and range delays and repeats SVA: Package for dynamic and range delays and repeats | Verification Academy
- Free books: Component Design by Example FREE BOOK: Component Design by Example … A Step-by-Step Process Using VHDL with UART as Vehicle | Verification Academy
Real Chip Design and Verification Using Verilog and VHDL($3) Amazon.com - Papers:
- Understanding the SVA Engine,
Verification Horizons - July 2020 | Verification Academy - SVA Alternative for Complex Assertions
Verification Horizons - March 2018 Issue | Verification Academy - SVA in a UVM Class-based Environment
SVA in a UVM Class-based Environment | Verification Horizons | Verification Academy