Should the extended abstract classes from abstract classes provide implementation to the pure virtual methods in the parent abstract class or not?

I came across this following paragraph in Systemverilog LRM
“Abstract classes may be extended to further abstract classes, but all pure virtual methods shall have overridden implementations in order to be extended by a non-abstract class.
By having implementations for all its methods, the class is complete and may now be constructed. Any class may be extended into an abstract class, and may provide additional or overridden pure virtual methods.”

Notice that it says the extended abstract classes should provide implementation for the pure virutal methods. but i wrote a program in which i didnt provide impmentation for the pure virtual method in the extended abstract class , but it is still working . Can anyone help me with this. Am i interpreting it wrong or is there some thing wrong with it ? The following is my code

// BASE ABSTRACT CLASS
virtual class base ;

  int a = 7;

  pure virtual function void display();

endclass

// CHILD ABSTRACT CLASS    
virtual class child extends base;

  int a = 4;

  pure virtual function void display(); 

endclass
  
// GRANDCHILD CLASS EXTENDED FROM CHILD ABSTRACT CLASS    
class grandchild extends child;

  int a = 8;

  function void display();
    $display("ITS WORKING !!!!!!!!!!!");
  endfunction

endclass
    
        
        

// MODULE TB
module tb;

 grandchild g1 ;
  
 initial
  begin
   g1 = new;
   g1.display();
  end
endmodule

It is working with all the simulators in the EDA playground

The LRM might not be perfectly clear here, but I believe the intent is to say that there must be an overriding implementation in any base class be at abstract or not before you get to construction the non-virtual class.

By the way, I see no purpose in redeclaring a pure virtual method in an extended abstract class. So even if it may be legal, it is an absurd case.