In reply to dave_59:
Thanks Dave for the details.
Note that there are other UVM bugs with comparing associative arrays. If you were to do
a.syndrome[2] = 0; // sET A VALUE IN ONE OBJECT ONLY that matches the default
b.syndrome[1] = 5; // sET B VALUE IN ONE OBJECT ONLY
Just a small query. I am using UVM-1.2. Are these bugs in UVM-1.2 also?