Verification question:To formal or not to formal?

http://www.deepchip.com/items/0534-05.html is a very interesting users feedback on the subject.

I fully agree with the following 2 comments because assertions, the bases for inputs to formal, clarify the requirements :

If I had to go and construct a team to build the chip right now, I would actually completely rearrange how the whole build would be. It would start with designing using formal. Adoption for formal is a lot more powerful if you come at it from a design background."

“It would be good to have “formal friendly” design specification, as sometimes the bugs are results of interaction of 7 or 8 designers. People sometimes have misunderstandings of what a specific paragraph in a document means.”

Ben Cohen http://www.systemverilog.us/

  • SystemVerilog Assertions Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2013
  • A Pragmatic Approach to VMM Adoption
  • Using PSL/SUGAR … 2nd Edition
  • Real Chip Design and Verification
  • Cmpt Design by Example
  • VHDL books