In reply to dave_59:
Thanks for the reply. I have gone through that discussion earlier only and I am aware of the difference between m_sequencer and p_sequencer and how to use them.
My question is, why UVM developers have used the names like m_sequencer and p_sequencer? why they have not used p_sequncer for an object of uvm_sequencer type?
I am aware of the fact that, uvm developers will be able to answer this. The query is whether m & p has significance or they were just some random names used by uvm developers?