In-line constraints

UVM
1

Why is it mentioned in multiple papers etc. that in-line constraints are not re-usable and hence should be avoided.
I don’t get this really.

If I have in-line constraints in the body of a sequence then when such a sequence is started then the constraints that sequence holds would be applied as well.

I am sure I am missing something …

2

In reply to verif_learner:

The problem is the in-line constraints are bound to the procedural flow and you cannot override the constraints without overriding the body completely.

3

In reply to dave_59:

In reply to verif_learner:
The problem is the in-line constraints are bound to the procedural flow and you cannot override the constraints without overriding the body completely.

Dave,

I understand that if one overrides the body of parent class then associated constraints are lost. This is a vague idea but can I not call super.body or instantiate such class and call appropriate function. I know I am talking very vague but I do hear about lack of re-use. I am thinking of ways to re-use something which is already coded.