Verification Academy

Search form

My Account Menu

  • Register
  • Log In
  • Topics
  • Courses
  • Forums
  • Patterns Library
  • Cookbooks
  • Events
  • More
  • All Topics
    The Verification Academy offers users multiple entry points to find the information they need. One of these entry points is through Topic collections. These topics are industry standards that all design and verification engineers should recognize. While we continue to add new topics, users are encourage to further refine collection information to meet their specific interests.
    • Languages & Standards

      • Portable Test and Stimulus
      • Functional Safety
      • Design & Verification Languages
    • Methodologies

      • UVM - Universal Verification Methodology
      • UVM Framework
      • UVM Connect
      • FPGA Verification
      • Coverage
    • Techniques & Tools

      • Verification IQ
      • Verification IP
      • Static-Based Techniques
      • Simulation-Based Techniques
      • Planning, Measurement, and Analysis
      • Formal-Based Techniques
      • Debug
      • Acceleration
  • All Courses
    The Verification Academy is organized into a collection of free online courses, focusing on various key aspects of advanced functional verification. Each course consists of multiple sessions—allowing the participant to pick and choose specific topics of interest, as well as revisit any specific topics for future reference. After completing a specific course, the participant should be armed with enough knowledge to then understand the necessary steps required for maturing their own organization’s skills and infrastructure on the specific topic of interest. The Verification Academy will provide you with a unique opportunity to develop an understanding of how to mature your organization’s processes so that you can then reap the benefits that advanced functional verification offers.
    • Universal Verification Methodology (UVM)

      • Introduction to UVM
      • UVM Basics
      • Advanced UVM
      • UVM Connect
      • UVM Debug
      • UVMF - One Bite at a Time
    • Featured Courses

      • Introduction to ISO 26262
      • Introduction to DO-254
      • Clock-Domain Crossing Verification
      • Portable Stimulus Basics
      • Power Aware CDC Verification
      • Power Aware Verification
      • SystemVerilog OOP for UVM Verification
    • Additional Courses

      • Assertion-Based Verification
      • An Introduction to Unit Testing with SVUnit
      • Evolving FPGA Verification Capabilities
      • Metrics in SoC Verification
      • SystemVerilog Testbench Acceleration
      • Testbench Co-Emulation: SystemC & TLM-2.0
      • Verification Planning and Management
      • VHDL-2008 Why It Matters
    • Formal-Based Techniques

      • Formal Assertion-Based Verification
      • Formal-Based Technology: Automatic Formal Solutions
      • Formal Coverage
      • Getting Started with Formal-Based Technology
      • Handling Inconclusive Assertions in Formal Verification
      • Sequential Logic Equivalence Checking
    • Analog/Mixed Signal

      • AMS Design Configuration Schemes
      • Improve AMS Verification Performance
      • Improve AMS Verification Quality
  • All Forum Topics
    The Verification Community is eager to answer your UVM, SystemVerilog and Coverage related questions. We encourage you to take an active role in the Forums by answering and commenting to any questions that you are able to.
    • UVM Forum

      • Active Questions
      • Solutions
      • Replies
      • No Replies
      • Search
      • UVM Forum
    • SystemVerilog Forum

      • Active Questions
      • Solutions
      • Replies
      • No Replies
      • Search
      • SystemVerilog Forum
    • Coverage Forum

      • Active Questions
      • Solutions
      • Replies
      • No Replies
      • Search
      • Coverage Forum
    • Additional Forums

      • Announcements
      • Downloads
      • OVM Forum
  • Patterns Library
    The Verification Academy Patterns Library contains a collection of solutions to many of today's verification problems. The patterns contained in the library span across the entire domain of verification (i.e., from specification to methodology to implementation—and across multiple verification engines such as formal, simulation, and emulation).
    • Implementation Patterns

      • Environment Patterns
      • Stimulus Patterns
      • Analysis Patterns
      • All Implementation Patterns
    • Specification Patterns

      • Occurrence Property Patterns
      • Order Property Patterns
      • All Specification Patterns
    • Pattern Resources

      • Start Here - Patterns Library Overview
      • Whitepaper - Taking Reuse to the Next Level
      • Verification Horizons - The Verification Academy Patterns Library
      • Contribute a Pattern to the Library
  • All Cookbooks
    Find all the methodology you need in this comprehensive and vast collection. The UVM and Coverage Cookbooks contain dozens of informative, executable articles covering all aspects of UVM and Coverage.
    • UVM Cookbook

      • UVM Basics
      • Testbench Architecture
      • DUT-Testbench Connections
      • Configuring a Test Environment
      • Analysis Components & Techniques
      • End Of Test Mechanisms
      • Sequences
      • The UVM Messaging System
      • Other Stimulus Techniques
      • Register Abstraction Layer
      • Testbench Acceleration through Co-Emulation
      • Debug of SV and UVM
      • UVM Connect - SV-SystemC interoperability
      • UVM Versions and Compatibility
      • UVM Cookbook
    • Coding Guidelines & Deployment

      • Code Examples
      • UVM Verification Component
      • Package/Organization
      • Questa/Compiling UVM
      • SystemVerilog Guidelines
      • SystemVerilog Performance Guidelines
      • UVM Guidelines
      • UVM Performance Guidelines
    • Coverage Cookbook

      • Introduction
      • What is Coverage?
      • Kinds of Coverage
      • Specification to Testplan
      • Testplan to Functional Coverage
      • Bus Protocol Coverage
      • Block Level Coverage
      • Datapath Coverage
      • SoC Coverage Example
      • Requirements Writing Guidelines
      • Coverage Cookbook
  • All Events
    No one argues that the challenges of verification are growing exponentially. What is needed to meet these challenges are tools, methodologies and processes that can help you transform your verification environment. These recorded seminars from Verification Academy trainers and users provide examples for adoption of new technologies and how to evolve your verification process.
    • Featured & On-Demand

      • VA Live - Multiple Dates & Locations
      • Interconnect Formal
      • Formal and the Next Normal
      • Formal Verification Made Easy
      • Data Independence and Non-Determinism
      • Exhaustive Scoreboarding
      • Visualizer Debug Environment
      • Webinar Calendar
    • On-Demand Library

      • SystemVerilog Assertions
      • Practical Flows for Continuous Integration
      • Continuous Integration
      • Questa Verification IQ
      • Avery & Siemens VIP
      • Protocol and Memory Interface Verification
      • HPC Protocols & Memories
      • Preparing for PCIe 6.0: Parts I & II
      • High Defect Coverage
      • SoC Design & Functional Safety Flow
      • Complex Safety Architectures
      • All On-Demand Recordings
    • Recording Archive

      • Lint vs Formal AutoCheck
      • FPGA Design Challenges
      • Design Solutions as a Sleep Aid
      • Fix FPGA Failures Faster
      • CDC and RDC Assist
      • The Dog ate my RTL
      • Questa Lint & CDC
      • Hierarchical CDC+RDC
      • Improving Initial RTL Quality
      • CDC Philosophy
      • Hardware Emulation Productivity
      • The Three Pillars of Intent-Focused Insight
      • All Webinar Topics
    • Conferences & WRG

      • 2022 Functional Verification Study
      • Improving Your SystemVerilog & UVM Skills
      • Automotive Functional Safety Forum
      • Aerospace & Defense Tech Day
      • Siemens EDA Functional Verification
      • Industry Data & Surveys
      • DVCon 2023
      • DVCon 2022
      • DVCon 2021
      • Osmosis 2022
      • All Conferences
    • Siemens EDA Learning Center

      • EDA Xcelerator Academy(Learning Services) Verification Training, Badging and Certification
      • View all Xcelerator Academy classes
  • About Verification Academy
    The Verification Academy will provide you with a unique opportunity to develop an understanding of how to mature your organization's processes so that you can then reap the benefits that advanced functional verification offers.
    • Blog & News

      • Verification IQ
      • Verification Horizons Blog
      • Technical Resources
    • Verification Horizons Publication

      • Verification Horizons - March 2023
      • Verification Horizons - December 2022
      • Verification Horizons - July 2022
      • Issue Archive
    • About Us

      • Verification Academy Overview
      • Subject Matter Experts
      • Academy News
      • Contact Us
    • Training

      • Learning @OneGlance (PDF)
      • SystemVerilog & UVM Classes
      • Siemens EDA Classes
Ask a Question
UVM
  • Home
  • Forums
  • UVM
  • How to constraint variables with randc.(random-cyclic)?Am unable to get proper behavior of randc.

How to constraint variables with randc.(random-cyclic)?Am unable to get proper behavior of randc.

UVM 6753
randc usage constraint 2
Rao.Bee
Rao.Bee
Full Access
35 posts
September 09, 2020 at 12:32 am

I have declared the pkt_length variable as randc type.then i gave range for that variable with constraint.but it giving repeated values inside boundary only(means inside range only).
here my requirement was i need to do randomized the pkt_length with 255 times.but it getting repeated values only.
here small piece of code...

class ab_pkt extends uvm_sequence_item; 
.
.
.
.
   randc bit [15:0] pkt_length;
   constraint pkt_length_c{
	                     (pkt_length[15:8] inside {[8'h00:8'hFF]});
                          }
.
.
endclass

i have used that one in my sequence like below..

class ab_base_seq extends uvm_sequence #(ab_pkt);
.
.
.
  `uvm_do_with(req,{req.m_hwrite == 1;req.m_hburst == SINGLE;req.m_haddr == `PKT_REG;req.m_hwdata == req.pkt_length;})
		`uvm_info(get_type_name(), $sformatf("PKT LENGTH Reg = %h", req.pkt_length),UVM_LOW)
.
.
.
endclass

am repeating this sequence from testcase 255 times.

is there any other method to do that pkt_length randomization from 0 to 255.without repeating same value..?

thanks,

Replies

Log In to Reply

Solution

Solution

dave_59
dave_59
Forum Moderator
10909 posts
September 09, 2020 at 10:20 am

In reply to Rao.Bee:

The randc directive only works on the same object randomized with the same constraints. The `uvm_do macro creates a new object each time its used. You can either avoid using the `uvm_do macro (See https://verificationacademy.com/cookbook/sequences/generation#Sequence_Object_Persistance) or you will have to build a list of previous pkt_length values and add another constraint !(pkt_length inside {list};.

— Dave Rich, Verification Architect, Siemens EDA

Rao.Bee
Rao.Bee
Full Access
35 posts
September 09, 2020 at 9:05 pm

In reply to dave_59:

thanks dave.

in my case i cant remove uvm_do macro.
if i need to create pkt_length list..i need to write 0,1,2,3,......255.
is it good to write like that..in constraint ..?

chr_sue
chr_sue
Full Access
3896 posts
September 09, 2020 at 10:35 pm

In reply to Rao.Bee:

A more simple solution is to run the loop in the sequence and starting this sequence in the test. Running the loop in the test complicates your problem.

Rao.Bee
Rao.Bee
Full Access
35 posts
September 11, 2020 at 2:28 am

In reply to chr_sue:

thanks chr_sue,

am unable to give loop in sequence due to some protocol issue ..means it is changing my scenario..!

is it good to have unique constraint..?

chr_sue
chr_sue
Full Access
3896 posts
September 11, 2020 at 3:48 am

In reply to Rao.Bee:

I do not understand that the loop in the sequence should have any influence on the protocol. The protocol behavior is only definde by the driver.
BTW why do you ues the randc declaration? It should also work with a simple rand declaration.
The uniqie does nor solve your issue. Because you are egnerating in your sequence only 1 seq_item. In any case this is unique.

Rao.Bee
Rao.Bee
Full Access
35 posts
September 11, 2020 at 5:03 am

In reply to chr_sue:

thanks chr_sue,
actually that particular sequence used for other testcases also.so all the testcase may not require for_loop.
so i need to take care about that sequence.

testcase only there in my hand.

chr_sue
chr_sue
Full Access
3896 posts
September 11, 2020 at 6:42 am

In reply to Rao.Bee:

You could extend the current sequence, creating only 1 seq_item to another one which has a for loop inside.
The typical approch is to select for a testcase any sequence, creating/randomizing it and sdtarting this sequence on the corresponding sequencer.

dave_59
dave_59
Forum Moderator
10909 posts
September 11, 2020 at 9:33 am

In reply to Rao.Bee:

You can add a unique constraint to your `uvm_do_with macro.

  `uvm_do_with(req,{m_hwrite == 1;m_hburst == SINGLE;m_haddr == `PKT_REG;m_hwdata == pkt_length; unique {pkt_length, list}; })
list.push_back(req.pkt_length);
		`uvm_info(get_type_name(), $sformatf("PKT LENGTH Reg = %h", req.pkt_length),UVM_LOW)
.

Just remember the pain using the `uvm_do macros causes as you try to add more complexity and avoid it.

— Dave Rich, Verification Architect, Siemens EDA

Rao.Bee
Rao.Bee
Full Access
35 posts
September 13, 2020 at 6:43 am

In reply to dave_59:

thanks dave ,
now am able to do proper randomization.

Siemens Digital Industries Software

Siemens Digital Industries Software

#TodayMeetsTomorrow

Portfolio

  • Cloud
  • Mendix
  • Electronic Design Automation
  • MindSphere
  • Design, Manufacturing and PLM Software
  • View all Portfolio

Explore

  • Community
  • Blog
  • Online Store

Siemens

  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Events
  • News and Press
  • Customer Stories
  • Partners
  • Trust Center

Contact

  • VA - Contact Us
  • PLM - Contact Us
  • EDA - Contact Us
  • Worldwide Offices
  • Support Center
  • Give us Feedback
© Siemens 2023
Terms of Use Privacy Statement Cookie Statement DMCA