Does p_sequencer differently use between in RAL model and non RAL model?

Hello?
I’m looking the p_sequence implemented code in the RAL model.
As I know basically the p_sequencer works as the sequence executor of each UVC’s interface.
BTW, when I look the RAL model. it seems quite a bit different work.

Does p_sequencer differently use between in RAL model and non RAL model?

In reply to UVM_LOVE:

You should have in mind the p_sequencer is a legal - but not the recommended - approach.
Using p_sequencer is independent on RAL.
Recommended is using the virtual sequence/serquencer approach.

In reply to chr_sue:

In reply to UVM_LOVE:
You should have in mind the p_sequencer is a legal - but not the recommended - approach.
Using p_sequencer is independent on RAL.
Recommended is using the virtual sequence/serquencer approach.

Thanks, But What does"Using p_sequencer is independent on RAL." mean?

In reply to UVM_LOVE:

You can assign any sequencer to be p_sequencer, independently if you are using RAL or not.