Do I need to make parameter when I make driver class as "uvm_driver #(REQ,RSP)"?
I got an error message about "seq_item_export" in
driver.seq_item_port.connect(sequencer.seq_item_export); when I ran uvm code without #(my_sequence_item )
class cmsdk_mcu_clock_reset_driver extends uvm_driver;
class cmsdk_mcu_clock_reset_sequencer extends uvm_sequencer #(my_sequence_item );
So I modify it as the below, the error gone about "seq_item_export"
class cmsdk_mcu_clock_reset_driver extends uvm_driver #(my_sequence_item );
class cmsdk_mcu_clock_reset_sequencer extends uvm_sequencer #(my_sequence_item );
So I did one more test I remove #(my_sequence_item ) on them. also there is no error.
but in the driver, I couldn't use "req".
Here I'm confused that if I declare with #(req, rsp) then how this code has more flexibility?
for example, if I declared as "class cmsdk_mcu_clock_reset_driver extends uvm_driver #(my_sequence_item )" then this code have to use only "my_sequence_item" not any other "sequence_item" couldn't.
