# Functional coverage

**URL:** <https://verificationacademy.com/forums/t/functional-coverage/35849>\
**Category:** Coverage\
**Tags:** Coverage\
**Created:** [March 12, 2019, 4:28am UTC](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/t/functional-coverage/35849 "2019-03-12T04:28:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tech\_savvy](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/d2c977/32.png) [@tech\_savvy](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/u/tech_savvy)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2019, 4:28am UTC](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/t/functional-coverage/35849/1 "2019-03-12T04:28:09Z")

</div>

Can we add coverage on sequencer? If yes, then what type of scenarios it can cover?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cgales](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/ccd318/32.png) [@cgales](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/u/cgales)\
**Post date:** [March 12, 2019, 10:03am UTC](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/t/functional-coverage/35849/2 "2019-03-12T10:03:45Z")

</div>

_In reply to [tech\_savvy](https://verificationacademy.com/forums/t/functional-coverage/35849):_

No. You should never modify a sequencer. In practice, you only want to accumulate coverage of what the DUT processes, hence the reason for collecting coverage on items from the monitor analysis ports.
