Verification Academy

Search form

My Account Menu

  • Register
  • Log In
  • Topics
  • Courses
  • Forums
  • Patterns Library
  • Cookbooks
  • Events
  • More
  • All Topics
    The Verification Academy offers users multiple entry points to find the information they need. One of these entry points is through Topic collections. These topics are industry standards that all design and verification engineers should recognize. While we continue to add new topics, users are encourage to further refine collection information to meet their specific interests.
    • Languages & Standards

      • Portable Test and Stimulus
      • Functional Safety
      • Design & Verification Languages
    • Methodologies

      • UVM - Universal Verification Methodology
      • UVM Framework
      • UVM Connect
      • FPGA Verification
      • Coverage
    • Techniques & Tools

      • Verification IQ
      • Verification IP
      • Static-Based Techniques
      • Simulation-Based Techniques
      • Planning, Measurement, and Analysis
      • Formal-Based Techniques
      • Debug
      • Acceleration
  • All Courses
    The Verification Academy is organized into a collection of free online courses, focusing on various key aspects of advanced functional verification. Each course consists of multiple sessions—allowing the participant to pick and choose specific topics of interest, as well as revisit any specific topics for future reference. After completing a specific course, the participant should be armed with enough knowledge to then understand the necessary steps required for maturing their own organization’s skills and infrastructure on the specific topic of interest. The Verification Academy will provide you with a unique opportunity to develop an understanding of how to mature your organization’s processes so that you can then reap the benefits that advanced functional verification offers.
    • Universal Verification Methodology (UVM)

      • Introduction to UVM
      • UVM Basics
      • Advanced UVM
      • UVM Connect
      • UVM Debug
      • UVMF - One Bite at a Time
    • Featured Courses

      • Introduction to ISO 26262
      • Introduction to DO-254
      • Clock-Domain Crossing Verification
      • Portable Stimulus Basics
      • Power Aware CDC Verification
      • Power Aware Verification
      • SystemVerilog OOP for UVM Verification
    • Additional Courses

      • Assertion-Based Verification
      • An Introduction to Unit Testing with SVUnit
      • Evolving FPGA Verification Capabilities
      • Metrics in SoC Verification
      • SystemVerilog Testbench Acceleration
      • Testbench Co-Emulation: SystemC & TLM-2.0
      • Verification Planning and Management
      • VHDL-2008 Why It Matters
    • Formal-Based Techniques

      • Formal Assertion-Based Verification
      • Formal-Based Technology: Automatic Formal Solutions
      • Formal Coverage
      • Getting Started with Formal-Based Technology
      • Handling Inconclusive Assertions in Formal Verification
      • Sequential Logic Equivalence Checking
    • Analog/Mixed Signal

      • AMS Design Configuration Schemes
      • Improve AMS Verification Performance
      • Improve AMS Verification Quality
  • All Forum Topics
    The Verification Community is eager to answer your UVM, SystemVerilog and Coverage related questions. We encourage you to take an active role in the Forums by answering and commenting to any questions that you are able to.
    • UVM Forum

      • Active Questions
      • Solutions
      • Replies
      • No Replies
      • Search
      • UVM Forum
    • SystemVerilog Forum

      • Active Questions
      • Solutions
      • Replies
      • No Replies
      • Search
      • SystemVerilog Forum
    • Coverage Forum

      • Active Questions
      • Solutions
      • Replies
      • No Replies
      • Search
      • Coverage Forum
    • Additional Forums

      • Announcements
      • Downloads
      • OVM Forum
  • Patterns Library
    The Verification Academy Patterns Library contains a collection of solutions to many of today's verification problems. The patterns contained in the library span across the entire domain of verification (i.e., from specification to methodology to implementation—and across multiple verification engines such as formal, simulation, and emulation).
    • Implementation Patterns

      • Environment Patterns
      • Stimulus Patterns
      • Analysis Patterns
      • All Implementation Patterns
    • Specification Patterns

      • Occurrence Property Patterns
      • Order Property Patterns
      • All Specification Patterns
    • Pattern Resources

      • Start Here - Patterns Library Overview
      • Whitepaper - Taking Reuse to the Next Level
      • Verification Horizons - The Verification Academy Patterns Library
      • Contribute a Pattern to the Library
  • All Cookbooks
    Find all the methodology you need in this comprehensive and vast collection. The UVM and Coverage Cookbooks contain dozens of informative, executable articles covering all aspects of UVM and Coverage.
    • UVM Cookbook

      • UVM Basics
      • Testbench Architecture
      • DUT-Testbench Connections
      • Configuring a Test Environment
      • Analysis Components & Techniques
      • End Of Test Mechanisms
      • Sequences
      • The UVM Messaging System
      • Other Stimulus Techniques
      • Register Abstraction Layer
      • Testbench Acceleration through Co-Emulation
      • Debug of SV and UVM
      • UVM Connect - SV-SystemC interoperability
      • UVM Versions and Compatibility
      • UVM Cookbook
    • Coding Guidelines & Deployment

      • Code Examples
      • UVM Verification Component
      • Package/Organization
      • Questa/Compiling UVM
      • SystemVerilog Guidelines
      • SystemVerilog Performance Guidelines
      • UVM Guidelines
      • UVM Performance Guidelines
    • Coverage Cookbook

      • Introduction
      • What is Coverage?
      • Kinds of Coverage
      • Specification to Testplan
      • Testplan to Functional Coverage
      • Bus Protocol Coverage
      • Block Level Coverage
      • Datapath Coverage
      • SoC Coverage Example
      • Requirements Writing Guidelines
      • Coverage Cookbook
  • All Events
    No one argues that the challenges of verification are growing exponentially. What is needed to meet these challenges are tools, methodologies and processes that can help you transform your verification environment. These recorded seminars from Verification Academy trainers and users provide examples for adoption of new technologies and how to evolve your verification process.
    • Featured & On-Demand

      • Continuous Integration - March 28th
      • Questa Verification IQ - April 11th
      • SystemVerilog Assertions
      • SoC Design & Functional Safety Flow
      • 2022 Functional Verification Study
      • Design Solutions as a Sleep Aid
      • CDC and RDC Assist
      • Formal and the Next Normal
      • Protocol and Memory Interface Verification
      • Webinar Calendar
    • On-Demand Library

      • Practical Flows for Continuous Integration
      • Lint vs Formal AutoCheck
      • The Three Pillars of Intent-Focused Insight
      • Formal Verification Made Easy
      • Fix FPGA Failures Faster
      • HPC Protocols & Memories
      • FPGA Design Challenges
      • High Defect Coverage
      • The Dog ate my RTL
      • Questa Lint & CDC
      • Complex Safety Architectures
      • Data Independence and Non-Determinism
      • Hierarchical CDC+RDC
      • All On-Demand Recordings
    • Recording Archive

      • Aerospace & Defense Tech Day
      • Exhaustive Scoreboarding
      • Improving Initial RTL Quality
      • CDC Philosophy
      • Hardware Emulation Productivity
      • Visualizer Debug Environment
      • Preparing for PCIe 6.0: Parts I & II
      • Automotive Functional Safety Forum
      • Siemens EDA Functional Verification
      • Improving Your SystemVerilog & UVM Skills
      • All Webinar Topics
    • Conferences & WRG

      • Industry Data & Surveys
      • DVCon 2023
      • DVCon 2022
      • DVCon 2021
      • Osmosis 2022
      • All Conferences
    • Siemens EDA Learning Center

      • SystemVerilog Fundamentals
      • SystemVerilog UVM
      • EDA Xcelerator Academy(Learning Services) Verification Training, Badging and Certification
      • View all Learning Paths
  • About Verification Academy
    The Verification Academy will provide you with a unique opportunity to develop an understanding of how to mature your organization's processes so that you can then reap the benefits that advanced functional verification offers.
    • Blog & News

      • Verification IQ
      • Verification Horizons Blog
      • Technical Resources
    • Verification Horizons Publication

      • Verification Horizons - March 2023
      • Verification Horizons - December 2022
      • Verification Horizons - July 2022
      • Issue Archive
    • About Us

      • Verification Academy Overview
      • Subject Matter Experts
      • Academy News
      • Contact Us
    • Training

      • Learning @OneGlance (PDF)
      • SystemVerilog & UVM Classes
      • Siemens EDA Classes
Ask a Question
SystemVerilog
  • Home
  • Forums
  • SystemVerilog
  • how to assert a bit sequence using concurrent assertions

how to assert a bit sequence using concurrent assertions

SystemVerilog 6318
systemverilog 33 assertion 95 concurrent assertion 8
raghav kumar
raghav kumar
Forum Access
17 posts
April 15, 2015 at 10:07 pm

I am trying to assert an output bit sequence of 8 bit (e.g. 11010101),its a serial communication ,so i don't understand how to match it with expected data ,where clock used for assertion is of time period of 1 bit with respect to data

Replies

Log In to Reply
raku
raku
Full Access
37 posts
April 16, 2015 at 4:07 am

In reply to raghav kumar:

Your question is not clear please post some more details about the question .
1)Like what is the input the DUT.
2) What is the output from DUT.

Also please add some more details of this statement "clock used for assertion is of time period of 1 bit with respect to data"

raghav kumar
raghav kumar
Forum Access
17 posts
April 16, 2015 at 5:23 am

In reply to raku:

1)Like what is the input the DUT.
2) What is the output from DUT.

if (reset_n && Enable)==1 output is 11010101

clock used for assertion is of time period of 1 bit with respect to data"
as the data is serial ,so one bit per clock, and i want to use same clock for assertions

raku
raku
Full Access
37 posts
April 16, 2015 at 6:21 am

In reply to raghav kumar:

I think you meant input is parallel of 8 bit data and output in serial and i assume enable will be high for continuous eight bits of data and then go low .

Class monitor

bit [7:0] cap_value;
virtual interface _intf;
scoreboard sb;


task run_phase (uvm_phase phase);

while(1) begin
wait(_intf.enable);
get_value();
sb.compare(cap_value);
end
endtask

task get_value();

for (int i=0;i<8;i++) begin
cap_value = cap_value << 1;
cap_value[0] = _intf.output_data;
@(posedge _intf.clk);
end

endtask

endclass

class scoreboard

task compare(bit [7:0] cap_value);

if(exp_value != cap_value) $display ("error");
endtask

endclass

ben@SystemVerilog.us
ben@SystemVerilog.us
Full Access
2600 posts
April 16, 2015 at 9:59 am

module par2ser;
  bit[7:0] data; 
  bit clk, sync, serial; 
  property p_data_msb2lsb; // updated
      bit[7:0] v_data, v_collected;
      bit[2:0] i;
      @(posedge clk)(sync, v_data=data, i=0) |=> // serial output is from lsb to msb 
          (1, v_collected[i]=serial, i=i+1'b1)[*8] ##1 v_collected==v_data; 
  endproperty 
 
  property p_data_lsb2msb; // updated
      bit[7:0] v_data, v_collected;
      bit[2:0] i;
      @(posedge clk)(sync, v_data=data, i=7) |=> // serial output is from msb to lsb 
          (1, v_collected[i]=serial, i=i-1'b1)[*8] ##1 v_collected==v_data; 
  endproperty 
 
  ap_data_msb2lsb: assert property(p_data_msb2lsb); 
  a_data_lsb2msb:  assert property(_data_lsb2msb); 
 
endmodule

Ben Cohen http://www.systemverilog.us/
* SystemVerilog Assertions Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2013
* A Pragmatic Approach to VMM Adoption
* Using PSL/SUGAR ... 2nd Edition
* Real Chip Design and Verification
* Cmpt Design by Example
* VHDL books
raku
raku
Full Access
37 posts
April 16, 2015 at 10:37 am

In reply to ben@SystemVerilog.us:

Thanks Ben for the answer but i have one doubt .
Please explain when or if sync is high thought 8 cycles does this assertion creates multiple threads or a single thread is created.Also if multiple thread are creates whether "i" value of assertion in each thread remains different from each or all will have same value

ben@SystemVerilog.us
ben@SystemVerilog.us
Full Access
2600 posts
April 16, 2015 at 11:18 am

In reply to raku:

1) I made a slight mistake, which I corrected above, I missed the "1" in
(1, v_collected[i]=serial, i=i-1'b1)

 property p_data_lsb2msb; // Updated 
      bit[7:0] v_data, v_collected;
      bit[2:0] i;
      @(posedge clk)(sync, v_data=data, i=7) |=> // serial output is from msb to lsb 
          (1, v_collected[i]=serial, i=i-1'b1)[*8] ##1 v_collected==v_data; 
  endproperty 

Quote:
Please explain when or if sync is high thought 8 cycles does this assertion creates multiple threads or a single thread is created.Also if multiple thread are creates whether "i" value of assertion in each thread remains different from each or all will have same value

I assumed that sync was one pulse, indicating the start of the serial transmission, before the first bit of data, like the one in a UART. I don't know your design, but if sync is high for all 8 bits, then you can do something like
module par2ser;
  bit[7:0] data; 
  bit clk, sync, serial; 
  property p_data_msb2lsb; 
      bit[7:0] v_data, v_collected;
      bit[2:0] i;
      @(posedge clk)($rose(sync), v_data=data, i=0) |-> // serial output is from lsb to msb 
          (1, v_collected[i]=serial, i=i+1'b1)[*8] ##1 v_collected==v_data; 
  endproperty 
 
  property p_data_lsb2msb; 
      bit[7:0] v_data, v_collected;
      bit[2:0] i;
      @(posedge clk)($rose(sync), v_data=data, i=7) |-> // serial output is from msb to lsb 
          (1, v_collected[i]=serial, i=i-1'b1)[*8] ##1 v_collected==v_data; 
  endproperty 
 
  ap_data_msb2lsb: assert property(p_data_msb2lsb); 
  a_data_lsb2msb:  assert property(_data_lsb2msb); 


In this case, there is one thread for the successful attempt. The $rose insures one successful attempt, and one thread. You have multiple threads in a successful attempt if you have in the antecedent the ORing of sequences, like
a ##[1:4] b |-> c
a ##1 b[*1:4] |-> c
Here ypou would need a first_match() lile
first_match(a ##[1:4] b) |-> c
first_match(a ##1 b[*1:4]) |-> c 

Each local variable for each atteempt, when the assertion is first sampled and started, is independent of other previously threads started at previous attempts.
Local variables are "local" to the property.
Ben SystemVerilog.us
raku
raku
Full Access
37 posts
April 16, 2015 at 11:38 am

In reply to ben@SystemVerilog.us:

Thanks Ben for clarifying my doubt .

Siemens Digital Industries Software

Siemens Digital Industries Software

#TodayMeetsTomorrow

Portfolio

  • Cloud
  • Mendix
  • Electronic Design Automation
  • MindSphere
  • Design, Manufacturing and PLM Software
  • View all Portfolio

Explore

  • Community
  • Blog
  • Online Store

Siemens

  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Events
  • News and Press
  • Customer Stories
  • Partners
  • Trust Center

Contact

  • VA - Contact Us
  • PLM - Contact Us
  • EDA - Contact Us
  • Worldwide Offices
  • Support Center
  • Give us Feedback
© Siemens 2023
Terms of Use Privacy Statement Cookie Statement DMCA